Lesson 4

Big Prize or Safe Prize?

Choose a bigger reward together or a smaller reward alone, and see where trust matters

The teamwork choice

Story: You and a partner can go for a big reward together, or each take a smaller safe reward alone.

Imagine you and a friend are hunters. There are two things you can hunt today:

The Stag — a big deer worth 4 points to each of you. But you can only catch it if you both work together. One hunter alone can’t do it.

The Hare — a small rabbit worth 3 points to whoever catches it. You can get this alone, no teamwork needed.

Here’s the full picture:

Partner hunts stagPartner hunts hare
You hunt stagYou: 4 pts, Partner: 4 ptsYou: 0 pts, Partner: 3 pts
You hunt hareYou: 3 pts, Partner: 0 ptsYou: 2 pts, Partner: 2 pts

Play the Hunt

The Hunt — 5 Rounds Will you trust your partner to go for the big prize?
You 0
Round 1 /5
Partner 0
🤔 Your partner is deciding...

Two answers can both make sense

Here’s what’s interesting about this game — it has two perfectly good answers:

Answer 1: Both hunt stag → both get 4 points. This is the best possible result! But it only works if you trust each other.

Answer 2: Both hunt hare → both get 2 points. This is safe. No trust needed.

Big idea: the best group result is not always the choice that feels safest to each person.

The trust question

This game is really about trust and expectations:

In real life, this shows up whenever teamwork creates a bigger reward:

The hard part is usually not the math. It is building trust.

Practice

If both players hunt stag, what does each one get?

You hunt stag, your partner hunts hare. What do you get?

In the Stag Hunt, why might someone choose hare even if stag pays more when both cooperate?

Both hunting hare gives 2 points each. Both hunting stag gives 4 points each. If you could talk to your partner before choosing, what would you suggest?